summary of sarbanes oxley_______________________________________Advertisement For the general public, the Enron scandal was confusing and without proper media coverage would have been just a confusing mess to most people. The whole scandal seemed to be about big business officials and how they cheated somehow in their dealings. However, to the public that were just normal people it wasn’t quite so funny. Many people lost their 401ks and retirement funds because the share market declined so much due to the inside hedge funding and insider trading that took place the night before the stock value share of the securities market dropped drastically. Therefore, it’s easy to see why it can be hard understanding summary of sarbanes oxley, the follow-up legislation passed to prevent this from occurring again. The key to understanding summary of sarbanes oxley is to look at the reason it was passed. Big business in effect took control to make money, by leaving individual public investors out in the cold. Therefore, the government saw fit to step in and make sure this would not occur again. What is the best way to make sure that people do not repeat their crimes; by waving punishment clearly in their faces. Basically, understanding summary of sarbanes oxley means understanding the principles of rules and consequences for breaking them. The government basically put forth a new set of laws and regulations that clearly state that insider trading is prohibited in the securities market and put into legislation exactly what and what not business men are allowed to do so that there would be no further trials in which they claimed the laws were fuzzy. Once business men are able to reach a point of understanding summary of sarbanes oxley, they also will understand that the law clearly outlines how they will be punished if they choose to break the regulations the federal government put into place. When understanding summary of sarbanes oxley, you need to understand that it was the first time that the US government ever put forth legislature that directly held corporate executive officers (CEO’s) directly responsible for their businesses financial statements. In simple this means that if something is done by an employee at a large business that deals with the security market, the CEO will be held legally responsible for any financial damage that may ensue regardless of their involvement, since it is their business primarily. This is also one of the largest reasons why there are many opponents of Sarbanes Oxley, because they feel the government has placed too many restrictions on the business world unfairly. |